I have researched into the most common codes and conventions and the mode of documentary from these three documentaries. I chose these three documentaries specifically to research as their topics related to regional places. As well as the codes and conventions, I also analysed the reviews of each documentary from several different websites to find out how successful the documentaries were. I did this to see if the codes and conventions that they used made the documentary successful and therefore if I used these codes and conventions in my documentary, then possibly my documentary would be as highly viewed by my target audience.
Following my first drafts, I altered certain parts of my documentary to improve it, based on what I thought needed improving, some specific errors that I had originally made that needed correcting, and from feedback from some of my target audience. I collected the same group of five people that had originally watched my first and second draft to gather their opinions of my third and final draft. In comparison to previously, all of my target audience said that they enjoyed watching my documentary (as one person was undecided last time), meaning that the changes that I had made to my documentary were for the better and improved it. When asked if my third and final draft was better than my original two, the results were unanimous and all five participants believed that this draft was certainly the best out of the three. I next asks my participants what made my documentary better in their opinion. In comparison to my first draft, the third draft included way more information, including new...
Comments
Post a Comment